Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
utsfl:classroom:seminars:pbs110h [2013/09/29 10:04] – integrated my notes and Schouten's and restructured balleyneutsfl:classroom:seminars:pbs110h [2016/11/04 22:05] (current) mmccann
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== PBS110H: The Pre-Born Child and Canadian Law ====== +====== PBS110H: Campus Media Strategy ======
-These notes from the first half of André Schouten's 2013 NCLN Symposium talk, //A Legal Wasteland: The Pre-Born Child and Canadian Law// +
- +
-===== History ===== +
-FIXME more details here +
-  * pre-confederation "quick with child" (first time a mother feels her child move, around 16 weeks child was protected by law) +
-  * 1869 (first criminal code): abortion a crime at any time, punished by next stiffest penalty after death penalty +
-  * 1969: Trudeau's omnibus bill, therapeutic abortion committee +
-  * 1988: R. v. Morgentaler: unconstitutional on procedural grounds, because it unequally applied to Canadian women (in terms of abortion availability) +
-  * 1991: Bill C-43 fails; died in a tie vote +
-    * pro-life and pro-choice citizens were united against this bill, it wasn't a great bill +
- +
-===== The Present ===== +
-What does the criminal law say about the pre-born child? +
- +
-FIXME WNAL website +
- +
-  * Section 223(1), (2): +
-    * "child becomes a human being within the meaning of this Act when it has completely proceeded, in a living state, from the body of its mother whether or not (a) it has breathed, (b) it has independent circulation, or (c) the navel string is severed. (2) A person commits homicide when he causes injury to a child before or during its birth as a result of which the child dies after becoming a human being" +
-      * Does our criminal code refer to children using "it" elsewhere? +
-  * Section 238.(1) +
-    * (1) Everyone who causes the death, in the act of birth, of any child that has not become a human being, in such a manner that, if the child were a human being he would be guilty of murder, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life +
-  * R. v. Drummond, 1996, Ont. Ct. J. +
-    * 7 months pregnant, shotgun into cervix, pulled the trigger +
-    * charged with... attempted murder +
-      * the charge didn't stick; the thing she was attempting to murder wasn't a human being +
-    * charged and found guilty of: failure to provide the necessities of life +
-      * not because she shot her child in the head, but because she didn't tell the doctors +
-  * R. v. Levkovic: FIXME +
-    * Canadian law is more concerned about dead babies than living pre-born babies+
  
 FIXME FIXME
-  * Other Relevant Laws +  * Western 
-    * Section 223: Homicide +    * Fall 2015 Lifeline Chalking 
-    * Section 242-243: Neglect in Child-birth and Concealing Dead Body +    *   http://www.westerngazette.ca/news/western-apologizes-for-removing-usc-approved-pro-life-chalk/article_4d46cf21-f769-5465-b2db-9a0b17c8ac08.html 
-    Section 215Duties Tending to Preservation of Life +      http://www.westerngazette.ca/opinion/abortion-is-still-widely-debated-but-women-s-health-should/article_218cbd00-b331-11e5-900d-f3bd1dfd4478.html 
- +    *   http://www.westerngazette.ca/opinion/letter-life-is-valuable-and-should-be-respected/article_6055fb82-b4ad-11e5-8e5f-837a5d7e498c.html 
-===== Re-emerging Issues ===== +    Fall 2016 London Against Abortion coverage https://londonagainstabortion.wordpress.com/media-coverage/  
-FIXME use these for 200/300-level topics -- here, just name and summarize each +  [[:utsfl:media:coverage|UTSFL media coverage]] 
-  * gendercide +  Ryerson 
-  * eugenics (pre-born screening) +    http://ryersonian.ca/pro-life-protesters-back-on-campus/ 
-  * pro-life clubs campus free speech +    https://theeyeopener.com/2016/10/pro-life-group-at-ryerson-faced-with-a-counter-protest-again/ 
-  access to information +  Fanshawe 
-  infanticidethe 491 from Stats Canada +    * https://www.facebook.com/torontoagainstabortion/posts/1130112557071572
-  * AHRA: Assisted Human Reproduction Act (after 15 years to created the law, gutted by Supreme Court) +
-     * four principles +
-      * human dignity +
-      * protection of health and safety +
-      * non-commodification +
-      * non-commercialization +
-    * Quebec wasn't happy that the federal government passed a law dealing with health issues +
-      4 said completely provincial, 4 said completely federal; last one said some sections are provincial, others federal +
-      * consequences +
-        * no strong, consistent, national standard (Alberta can go nuts, Quebec has their own law which is actually pretty good) +
-        some provinces have no intention of regulating +
-        * no controls on human embryo experimentation +
-        * human-animal hybrid experimentation is now allowed +
-        no health regulations in place +
-      McLachin's Dissent +
-        "Parliament has a strong interest in ensuring that basic moral standards govern the creation and destruction of life, as well as their impact on persons like donors and mothers." +
-        Section 11 recognizes..+
-        Section 13The production of human life in clandestine..+
-        * creating life outside the womb could "transform society and redefine the lives of generations to come" and raise "serious questions about social ethical, legal and health issues" +
- +