Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
utsfl:classroom:seminars:pba350h [2024/01/28 22:01] – [Embryo Adoption] into the weeds on Catholic objections to embryo adoption mmccannutsfl:classroom:seminars:pba350h [2025/03/12 10:36] (current) – note that embryo adoption and IVF should be more closely linked, rather than treated as separate topics balleyne
Line 63: Line 63:
  
 FIXME CCBR position piece https://www.endthekilling.ca/blog/2018/11/22/in-vitro-fertilization-a-human-rights-perspective/ FIXME CCBR position piece https://www.endthekilling.ca/blog/2018/11/22/in-vitro-fertilization-a-human-rights-perspective/
 +
 +FIXME resource? Or insensitive/unclear? https://x.com/FrMatthewLC/status/1878833968860242226
  
 ===== Cloning ===== ===== Cloning =====
Line 75: Line 77:
  
 ===== Embryo Adoption ===== ===== Embryo Adoption =====
 +FIXME this is an extension of the IVF question. Either cloning becomes a quick "aside", or these should be back-to-back or something. The topics are more closely linked than suggested by this layout. (Though... perhaps so is embryonic stem cell research? The flow should be considered here, order of topics...)
 +
 This needs more polished notes, but the core for this section is: This needs more polished notes, but the core for this section is:
   * Introduce the concept of embryo adoption, explain what it is   * Introduce the concept of embryo adoption, explain what it is
Line 102: Line 106:
 FIXME responses to the slightly psychotic view of some Catholics that we should just "thaw them, baptise them, and bury them"  FIXME responses to the slightly psychotic view of some Catholics that we should just "thaw them, baptise them, and bury them" 
  
-FIXME Stephanie Gray gives the rescue-arguments for, and some (IMO bizarre) arguments against((Stephanie's analogy about taking kidneys from your own children to help the other sick children seems seriously flawed, because she equates "sacrificing a window of opportunity for conceiving a new child" with "taking necessary resources away from your own children". But as pro-lifers who know that life does not begin before fertilization, how does it make sense to say that sacrificing a window of opportunity of fertility, for the sake of saving another baby's life, is the same thing as taking away from your children... when those children have not been conceived and therefore do not exist? +FIXME Stephanie Gray gives the rescue-arguments for, and some (IMO bizarre) arguments against((Stephanie's analogy about taking kidneys from your own children to help the other sick children seems seriously flawed, because she equates "sacrificing a window of opportunity for conceiving a new child / temporarily sacrificing the space where your new child is biologically supposed to live" with "taking necessary resources away from your own children". But as pro-lifers who know that life does not begin before fertilization, how does it make sense to say that sacrificing a window of opportunity of fertility, for the sake of saving another baby's life, is the same thing as taking away from your children... when those children have not been conceived and therefore do not exist?