Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
utsfl:classroom:seminars:pba330h [2021/03/11 18:34] – balleyneutsfl:classroom:seminars:pba330h [2021/03/11 20:09] (current) – balleyne
Line 2: Line 2:
 <note>This is based heavily on Section 9.5 of Christopher Kaczor's //The Ethics of Abortion//</note> <note>This is based heavily on Section 9.5 of Christopher Kaczor's //The Ethics of Abortion//</note>
  
-Abortion advocates sometimes claim that "abortion is safer than childbirth." How can we respond?+Abortion advocates sometimes claim that "abortion is safer than childbirth" or "without legal abortion, women will die." How can we respond?
  
 The detailed answer is that advances in medicine and proper maternal healthcare are what make pregnancy safe, not abortion. This is a bit of a deep dive on the statistics and case studies so that we have the background to understand why abortion is not the answer to reducing maternal mortality. The detailed answer is that advances in medicine and proper maternal healthcare are what make pregnancy safe, not abortion. This is a bit of a deep dive on the statistics and case studies so that we have the background to understand why abortion is not the answer to reducing maternal mortality.
 +
 +FIXME this content is good, but it needs to be explained in a more accessible way, otherwise people get lost in the stats and don't get the bigger point. Some slides/visuals to illustrate the points? Or more of a concise summary? Perhaps changing the flow - this starts out deep in the weeds and slowly works towards a succinct conclusion, instead of maybe answering the question up front and then elaborating?
  
 ===== Illegal Abortions ===== ===== Illegal Abortions =====
Line 111: Line 113:
  
 > The argument about the relationship between women’s health and abortion is an important one, but it is only one aspect of a larger conversation. Let’s suppose that giving birth were more risky for a woman’s health than getting an abortion. Let’s suppose that legalized abortion did lead to lower overall rates of maternal mortality. Would it follow that abortion is morally permissible? Would it follow that abortion should be legalized? It seems clear that a few other questions must also be answered in order to come to a balanced and holistic judgment. These questions include, is the human being in utero someone who has intrinsic worth and equal basic dignity? Is it permissible to intentionally kill one human being (one’s own son or daughter) in order to lower the likelihood of adverse effects for oneself? It is permissible to use one person simply as a means, indeed to destroy this person’s life, in order to achieve some worthwhile end? It is also relevant to mention that abortion may be more or less risky for the woman involved but **it is always fatally risky for the fetus involved. Abortion may or may not leave one injured, but it always leaves one dead.** > The argument about the relationship between women’s health and abortion is an important one, but it is only one aspect of a larger conversation. Let’s suppose that giving birth were more risky for a woman’s health than getting an abortion. Let’s suppose that legalized abortion did lead to lower overall rates of maternal mortality. Would it follow that abortion is morally permissible? Would it follow that abortion should be legalized? It seems clear that a few other questions must also be answered in order to come to a balanced and holistic judgment. These questions include, is the human being in utero someone who has intrinsic worth and equal basic dignity? Is it permissible to intentionally kill one human being (one’s own son or daughter) in order to lower the likelihood of adverse effects for oneself? It is permissible to use one person simply as a means, indeed to destroy this person’s life, in order to achieve some worthwhile end? It is also relevant to mention that abortion may be more or less risky for the woman involved but **it is always fatally risky for the fetus involved. Abortion may or may not leave one injured, but it always leaves one dead.**
 +
 +The key to the response:
 +  * Compare Canada/US to Ireland/Poland - it can't be legal abortion that's necessary to save lives
 +  * //Bring it back to the central question//: _Every_ successful abortion kills a human being. If we add the abortion deaths of the children who are killed by the abortion, it's clear that abortion is not the safer option.
 +
 +Bonus, information on the debate about the Texas MMR:
 +  * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPzhk-rdv7M
 +  * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nHGH96YHkQ
 +    * https://lozierinstitute.org/new-study-maternal-mortality-in-texas-rose-earlier-than-previously-claimed/