Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
utsfl:classroom:seminars:pba302h [2015/11/09 10:07] – created this seminar based on Gilbert's equivocating balleyne | utsfl:classroom:seminars:pba302h [2021/03/03 20:24] (current) – [Some Contraceptives Are Abortifacients] ERI pro-life counterpoint balleyne | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== PBA302H: | + | ====== PBA302H: |
- | Human life begins at fertilization. Fertilization | + | UTSFL is neutral on the morality |
- | This is bad news for abortion | + | We need to understand the relationship between various forms of birth control and abortion |
- | The author of the CSB328H textbook apparently contests that there is a clear scientific answer((http:// | ||
- | > “Are scientists agreed | + | ===== Some Contraceptives |
- | > | + | * Contraception itself doesn' |
- | > (Scott Gilbert:)No. There are several scientifically defensible positions as to when human life begins. One position is that human life begins when the human egg and sperm nuclei fuse at fertilization. This is the “genetic view.” A second position is that human life begins when the embryo becomes | + | * http://www.abort73.com/ |
+ | * FIXME Does the pill // | ||
+ | * However, if there's uncertainty about whether ot not a human being is being killed, shouldn' | ||
+ | * Demolition analogy | ||
+ | * Hunting " | ||
+ | * Methotrexate / eczema example | ||
- | ===== Scientific Debate? | + | ===== Abortion Providers Report Most of their Clients Were Using Contraception |
- | Let's take these four positions in reverse order: | + | Ann Furedi, bpas Chief Executive, said: |
- | ==== The birthday view ==== | + | > The answer to unsafe abortion |
- | > The fourth position | + | |
- | Does any credible scientific source actually believe this? With in utero surgery, with neo-natal intensive care units and viability near the mid-point of pregnancy? That "human life begins at birth"? | + | https:// |
- | This is not a scientifically defensible position. This is just the dependency error in SLED. Being metabolically independent does not tell us when a new individual human organism has come into existence | + | * The de facto view: contraception reduces abortion |
+ | * FIXME Abby Johnson points to Guttmacher stats that 54% of women having abortions were using contraception https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/tell-me-that-good-one-again-about-how-contraception-decreases-abortions | ||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | * Only long acting reversible contraception? | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
+ | * [[wp> | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
+ | * Over 5 years... FIXME confirm numbers | ||
+ | * condom: 63% chance of pregnancy | ||
+ | * pill: 38% chance of pregnancy | ||
+ | * IUD: 2% | ||
+ | * Even with an IUD, over 5 years, 1 in 50 couples who are having sex but are not open to having a children will be faced with a unplanned pregnancy... | ||
- | ==== EEG View ==== | ||
- | > A third position is that human life begins when the human-specific electroencephalogram (EEG) is acquired at around 25 weeks. Since our society has defined human death as the loss of the EEG pattern (and not, say, when the heart stopping or the cells dye), some scientists have argued that the acquisition of this EEG pattern be considered the time when the fetus becomes human. | ||
- | First, there is huge debate over [[wp>brain death]]. | + | ===== Do Contraceptives Reduce the Abortion Rate? ===== |
+ | * FIXME Ross Douhat on comparing like to like, red state versus blue state instead of developed versus developing | ||
+ | * Check maternal mortality rate too | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
- | Second, note the qualifier | + | ===== OTHER/FIXME ===== |
+ | * On the notion of sex and "consequences" | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
+ | * Planned Parenthood v. Casey | ||
+ | * Janet Smith on contraception and abortion | ||
+ | * pregnancy is not a disease | ||
- | But more importantly, the acquisition | + | ===== Review: Chemical Abortions ===== |
+ | These are direct forms of abortion, where the only purpose | ||
- | Brain death is the complete and irreversible loss of the pattern. Afterwards, there' | + | {{youtube> |
- | + | > A medical (or chemical) abortion | |
- | The acquisition of the pattern is an age-dependent feature of human development. This is just the level of development error in SLED. The EEG pattern doesn' | + | http:// |
- | + | ||
- | ==== 14 days ==== | + | |
- | > A second position is that human life begins when the embryo becomes an individual. This is the time, 14 days after fertilization, | + | |
- | + | ||
- | http:// | + | |
- | + | ||
- | From the CCBR classroom: | + | |
- | > Just because some humans have the ability to split into two, doesn’t mean that prior to the split one human didn’t exist. Take the case of the flatworm. If a flatworm | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ==== Geneticist View ==== | + | |
- | This is the widely accepted view. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | http:// | + | |
- | + | ||
- | If we were talking about climate change, the scientific consensus would be clear despite some minority objections. But we're talking about abortion, so some in the same group of people who argue it's anti-science to blow minority objections out of proportion on climate change now become anti-science themselves | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Ironically, this seems to be the view that Gilbert' | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Dr. Gerard M. Nadal responds to Gilbert' | + | |
- | > Gilbert boxed himself in with his truthful statement relative | + | |
- | > | + | |
- | > To see his gross inconsistency, | + | |
- | > | + | |
- | > The truth is that an organism’s essential identity, biologically speaking, is contained within its genome, its DNA. Let’s forget God and metaphysics for a moment and argue from a strictly atheistic perspective. | + | |
- | > | + | |
- | > Without the ‘contaminating’ dimensionality of religion, the science becomes clearer. | + | |
- | > | + | |
- | > An organism does not express all of its potential functions at once. Genetically, | + | |
- | > | + | |
- | > Gilbert can’t spin his way out of this one. All he can do is lay down a smokescreen | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ===== Philosophical Question? ==== | + | |
- | Some dodge the scientific question and claim that "when human life begins" | + | |
- | + | ||
- | That's only partially true. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Science can tell us where a biological human being begins, where a new individual organism of the human species comes into existence. That part is a question for science. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The question of when that biological human being -- organism of the human species -- has value or rights or personhood, that is certainly a philosophical question. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The philosophical deliberations, | + |