Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
utsfl:classroom:seminars:pba221h [2013/09/28 11:02] – created with links to CCBR classroom balleyne | utsfl:classroom:seminars:pba221h [2020/05/26 17:13] – [“We have to be tolerant, and that means respecting other opinions in morality”] mmccann | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== PBA221H: | + | ====== PBA221H: |
- | Dialogue Substream | + | |
- | * http://www.unmaskingchoice.ca/training/classroom/pictures | + | pre/ |
- | * http://www.unmaskingchoice.ca/training/classroom/pictures/abortion | + | |
+ | Powerpoint: [[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Dv-2K8nWJNeAK67Rf8JngfuYqCtOWmk9/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== What is (moral) relativism? ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Relativism: | ||
+ | > “…truth itself is relative to the standpoint of the judging subject…”((Simon Blackburn, Dictionary of Philosophy, 313.)) | ||
+ | {{youtube> | ||
+ | Thus, **moral relativism** holds that the truth of a statement of morality i.e., it is wrong to murder an innocent person, is relative to the person. | ||
+ | |||
+ | " | ||
+ | -- Beckwith and Koukl(( // | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Example statements ===== | ||
+ | ==== “You ought not judge other people’s values” ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | False. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Philosophical: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Conversational: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== “Morals are just what you are brought up with from your parents and society” ==== | ||
+ | False. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Philosophical: | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ex. “You only believe that because…x, | ||
+ | |||
+ | The point? | ||
+ | Truth has nothing to do with how we came to hold it. | ||
+ | </note> | ||
+ | Conversational: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== “What is right or wrong for me might not be right or wrong for you” ==== | ||
+ | False. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Philosophical: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Conversational: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== “We have to be tolerant, and that means respecting other opinions in morality” ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | False. | ||
+ | Philosophical: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Conversational: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <note important> | ||
+ | //People// who deserve respect/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Vs. | ||
+ | |||
+ | // | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | Maria: if there' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Student: * visibly confused * | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | ==== “Don’t like abortion? Don’t have one.” ==== | ||
+ | False. | ||
+ | Philosophical: | ||
+ | Conversational: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== “Who are you to impose your beliefs about right and wrong on me? Don’t force your opinion on me!” ==== | ||
+ | False. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Philosophical: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Conversational: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{youtube> | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | “If your friend went to the bar, got drunk and then wanted to drive would you tell him not to do that? | ||
+ | Someone could say “Well, I am not sure what I would do in that situation…” | ||
+ | A ‘would’ statement involves the person in a hypothetical situation. BUT we are not asking ‘would you’ but ‘should you.’ | ||
+ | |||
+ | So, if you get this response: | ||
+ | “If your friend went to the bar, got drunk and then wanted to drive, should you tell him not to do that, despite what you would do?” | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
+ | ==== “That is just your opinion, all opinions are equal.” ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | False. | ||
+ | Philosophical: | ||
+ | Conversational: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== “Society/ | ||
+ | False. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Philosophical: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Conversational: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== “Morals are just products of our evolutionary history. It explains why we find things to be right and wrong” ==== | ||
+ | False. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Philosophical: | ||
+ | (Also, confuses description / "this is how humans have acted" with prescription "this is how humans should act", confuses an ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Conversational: | ||