Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
utsfl:classroom:seminars:pba120h [2017/08/14 12:14] – mmccannutsfl:classroom:seminars:pba120h [2024/01/14 18:54] (current) – [Inspiring the Apathetic] mmccann
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== PBA120H: How to Effectively Dialogue About Pre-Born Human Rights ====== ====== PBA120H: How to Effectively Dialogue About Pre-Born Human Rights ======
  
-FIXME Include more mock-dialogue examples? +FIXME need a bank of role-playing scenarios, e.g. real things an interlocutor might say, personas, user stories to help facilitate role-playing dialogue (rather than just relying on people with experience latching on to something that comes to mind) 
 +  - Bridging the Gap 
 +  - Three-question apologetic 
 +  - Practice conversations 
 +    - Demo 
 +    - Pairs 
 +    - Small group conversations and critique
  
 ===== Integrating Head, Heart, and Hands: The Ambassador Model ===== ===== Integrating Head, Heart, and Hands: The Ambassador Model =====
  
 According to Aristotle, [[http://www.classicalwriting.com/blog/2010/01/12/discovering-the-arguments-artistic-and-inartistic-proofs/|effective communicators]] need to have ethos (credibility/character), pathos (empathy), and logos (logic). Roman Catholic Archbishop of Toronto, Cardinal Thomas Collins, puts it this way: we need to //build a bridge// (ethos), //touch the heart// (pathos), and then and only then can we effectively //deliver the message// (logos). If all we have is an argument, no one will want to listen. According to Aristotle, [[http://www.classicalwriting.com/blog/2010/01/12/discovering-the-arguments-artistic-and-inartistic-proofs/|effective communicators]] need to have ethos (credibility/character), pathos (empathy), and logos (logic). Roman Catholic Archbishop of Toronto, Cardinal Thomas Collins, puts it this way: we need to //build a bridge// (ethos), //touch the heart// (pathos), and then and only then can we effectively //deliver the message// (logos). If all we have is an argument, no one will want to listen.
 +{{ :utsfl:classroom:seminars:cc_good_ambassador.jpg?300|}}
 Another way to think about this is through Stand to Reason’s [[http://www.str.org/about/ambassadors-creed|ambassador model]]. To be effective pro-life ambassadors, we need: Another way to think about this is through Stand to Reason’s [[http://www.str.org/about/ambassadors-creed|ambassador model]]. To be effective pro-life ambassadors, we need:
  
Line 18: Line 24:
 **Wisdom in Dialogue: Being //Proactive// Rather than //Reactive//** **Wisdom in Dialogue: Being //Proactive// Rather than //Reactive//**
  
-Abortion advocates may ask a question that is designed to make the pro-lifer defend herself. It is important for the pro-lifer to remember the abortion advocate supports killing innocent children and that’s the position that should be challenged. A wise pro-life apologist will avoid getting distracted by tangential issues brought up by an abortion-advocate, and will //re-focus// the debate on the primary issue at hand: the killing of pre-born children.+Abortion advocates may ask a question that is designed to make the pro-lifer defend herself. ([[https://twitter.com/ApiecalypseNow/status/1151175609772584960|Here are several examples from Jen Bundock]]) It is important for the pro-lifer to remember the abortion advocate supports killing innocent children and that’s the position that should be challenged. A wise pro-life apologist will avoid getting distracted by tangential issues brought up by an abortion-advocate, and will //re-focus// the debate on the primary issue at hand: the killing of pre-born children.
  
 Here is a **dialogue example** from when the local media in St. Catharine's reported on CCBR's demonstrations in the city. Devorah Gilman responded proactively rather than reactively to a question from an abortion supporter: Here is a **dialogue example** from when the local media in St. Catharine's reported on CCBR's demonstrations in the city. Devorah Gilman responded proactively rather than reactively to a question from an abortion supporter:
  
-"[Nicole] McDowell, who said she cares for foster children, also asked [Devorah] Gilman how many foster children she was raising. +"[Nicole] McDowell, who said she cares for foster children, also asked [Devorah] Gilman how many foster children she was raising. 'Whether I personally adopt or foster children, can I not still speak out on behalf of the most vulnerable Canadian children that are being slaughtered?' said Gilman."((http://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/2017/06/20/pro-choicer-arrested-at-pro-life-rally))
- +
-'Whether I personally adopt or foster children, can I not still speak out on behalf of the most vulnerable Canadian children that are being slaughtered? said Gilman."((http://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/2017/06/20/pro-choicer-arrested-at-pro-life-rally))+
  
 For more examples of how to be proactive rather than reactive, check out this [[https://www.endthekilling.ca/blog/2016/11/30/use-your-game-sense|blog post]] from another CCBR staff member. For more examples of how to be proactive rather than reactive, check out this [[https://www.endthekilling.ca/blog/2016/11/30/use-your-game-sense|blog post]] from another CCBR staff member.
Line 41: Line 45:
 What if, instead of asserting an answer, your first friend takes out a sheet of paper and works out the problem with you, step by step? Now would you believe her? Yes, because she has shown you //how// she got to that answer. Now you can understand the problem, and the answer, for yourself. What if, instead of asserting an answer, your first friend takes out a sheet of paper and works out the problem with you, step by step? Now would you believe her? Yes, because she has shown you //how// she got to that answer. Now you can understand the problem, and the answer, for yourself.
  
-The principle that applies to math-tutoring also applies to pro-life dialogue: **Show, don't tell.** We need to give people //reasons// and //compelling evidence// for our views, rather than simply stating conclusions. We need to guide people to the truth so that they will understand and accept it for themselves.+The principle that applies to math-tutoring also applies to pro-life dialogue: **Show, don't tell.** We need to give people //reasons// and //compelling evidence// for our views, rather than simply stating conclusions. We need to guide people to the truth so that they will understand and accept it for themselves. We can show people the truth, rather than simply telling them, by asking questions, telling stories, and presenting evidence.
  
 ==== Ask Questions ==== ==== Ask Questions ====
-  * Ask questions to expose presuppositions +One of the most important aspects of pro-life dialogue is **asking questions.** Asking questions is important for several reasons: it shows you care and are willing to hear what the other person has to say; it keeps the other person in the conversation; and it forces the individual to explain his or her beliefs.
-    * "Be a toddler" strategy: repeatedly asking "why?" (especially for moral relativists--expose inconsistencies)+
  
-<note>+> "Questions have power. They can set us on a journey looking for answers we previously didn't know. Or, they can draw out of us answers that, deep down, we //did// know but hadn't acknowledged until the opportunity arose from a question." ((p. 11, //Love Unleashes Life//))
  
-“It amazes me sometimes just how quickly someone’s views on abortion will start changing, even during a very short conversation. One woman recently told me with great hostility that she supported abortion, because ‘A woman’s autonomy is greater than a baby’s autonomy.’ I translated that in my head to 'bigger, older humans should have power over smaller, younger humans' and I knew she probably didn't really believe that. So I responded by asking her, ‘Should our humanity be dependent on our size?’ She paused and admitted, **‘That’s a good question.’** At the same 'Choice' Chain, a man told me he was ‘Pro-abortion. A woman should have the right to choose what happens to her own body.’ I pointed to my image of an abortion victim and asked him whether we were talking about one body or two during pregnancy, and he agreed that there were two bodies involved. He only had time to speak for about a minute before leaving, but within that minute, he changed his position from staunchly pro-abortion to saying, ‘I haven’t really given it much thought. I’m not really firmly on one side or the other.’ We may not get more than a minute with some people on the street, but we can start impacting them quickly if we ask **compelling questions** and present **compelling evidence**. When we do that, we see that it really doesn’t take much for the pro-abortion worldview to start crumbling.”+Questions make people //think//. They make the wheels start turning in someone's head. We may not have an hour to dialogue with every person about abortion--in the context of pro-life activism such as "Choice" Chain, we may only get a few minutes to speak with someone. This is why we open our conversation with a question, such as, "What do //you// think about abortion?" By asking people compelling questions, people will have to think more deeply about the abortion issue and about their own views on it. 
  
 +<note> **The Power of Questions**
 +
 +"I once dialogued with a university student who, when asked what he thought about abortion, said he supported it. I asked a follow-up question and he declaratively said, 'I have news for you--they're not alive.' **So I asked another question: 'Then why would a woman have an abortion?'** He paused, clearly not expecting that, and said, 'Good point. Hold on, hold on, I have to go soon but I'll talk for a bit because it's rare to find someone who can think intelligently.'" - Stephanie Gray ((P. 35))
 </note> </note>
 +
  
 ==== Tell Stories ==== ==== Tell Stories ====
  
 +Stories are powerful because people can relate to stories. Stories paint a picture in people's heads so that they can see how a concept plays out in reality. By using stories, analogies, and vivid descriptions, we can help people understand concepts that seem abstract or unfamiliar.  
 +> "Tell stories to reach people’s hearts and minds. Brain scans reveal that stories stimulate and engage the human brain, helping the speaker connect with the audience and making it much more likely that the audience will agree with the speaker’s point of view." - Carmine Gallo((Author of //Talk Like TED//. Quote source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/carminegallo/2014/03/04/9-public-speaking-lessons-from-the-worlds-greatest-ted-talks/2/#40e5bb711fd0))
 +For instance, some people can have a hard time grasping the reality that the single-celled zygote produced through fertilization is a human being. How can something so very small, and something that looks very different from a born human, be equal to you and I? Using an analogy called "the Polaroid analogy" can help people to understand this concept better:
  
 +<note> **Polaroid analogy** 
  
 +Insert Tikvah's story
  
 +</note>
 +==== Give Evidence ====
  
 +One of the reasons that we use abortion victim photography in all of our projects is because the images present //compelling evidence// against abortion. They communicate instantly the humanity of the pre-born and the inhumanity of abortion. By using these images when we dialogue with people, we can ground our conversations in the reality of what abortion does--in the reality of what kind of "choice" we're talking about. 
  
-===== Bridging from the Head to the Heart ===== +<note> I approached a student and asked him if he was aware that Canada had no legal protection for the pre-born. He said no and we went on to talk about how Canada was one of three countries that allowed abortion in all nine months of pregnancy. We also discussed various circumstances of both mother and child, and developmental stages of the pre-born, etc., but he ultimately believed that abortion was permissible in the first trimester, but as soon as the pre-born began to resemble a human it should not be allowed to be killed. Having a card with a 10-week old aborted fetus in my pocket, I asked him if he’d ever seen such an image. He replied no, and when I showed him it, he was shocked. He didn’t comment on it immediately however, and I decided to let the image speak for itself. Instead, we continued to discuss other situations. 
-Heart apologetics? / beINSPIRED / bridging the gap from head to heart:+
  
-On branching from head to heart: http://www.unmaskingchoice.ca/blog/2013/10/07/ignorant-or-denial+After about another ten minutes of engaging in discussion, he brought up the image, and said: "You’re a smart guy with great arguments, but **nothing you said to me compares to the power of that image you showed me**. I can’t forget that. I think if you want to draw awareness to the reality of abortion, you should be doing more of that. If people see this, they won’t be so quick to abort their children." - Western University student, to Gerrit Van Dorland, [[https://www.endthekilling.ca/blog/2016/02/29/unity-our-best-shot-fortification|after seeing an image of an abortion victim]] 
 +</note>
  
-  - Understand +===== The Three Types of People We Encounter  =====
-  - Love  +
-  - Inspire+
  
-Head questions ask //what// someone believes, heart questions ask //why// someone believes what they believe.+==== Educating the Ignorant ====
  
 +Some people are simply ignorant concerning the truth about abortion, or support it without critically thinking about the issue. By presenting the truth to them in a compelling way, we can often see them shift their views right in front of us--if not change their minds completely. By showing images of abortion victims and by communicating the humanity and human rights of the pre-born, we can educate the uninformed and the misinformed. 
 +
 +==== Loving the Wounded ====
  
 > “Whom you would change, you must first love, and they must know that you love them.” - Martin Luther King Jr. > “Whom you would change, you must first love, and they must know that you love them.” - Martin Luther King Jr.
  
 +Although the pro-life position is simple and logical, some people will not be persuaded by the most rational arguments and evidence. Some people remain hostile or closed-off. Often, when no argument is getting through to an individual, it may be that he is not //ignorant// of the truth--rather, he doesn't want to know the truth. He is //in denial//. In other words, the problem is not in his head--but in his heart. 
 +
 +With Canada’s history littered with the corpses of over 4 million pre-born children, we shouldn’t be surprised. We are bringing a difficult truth to a deeply wounded culture. A whole lot of people we speak with aren’t merely defending a pro-abortion worldview in theory; they are defending their very selves, or their loved ones—their pasts, their deadly choices. When ignorant persons hears a pro-life argument, they are enlightened--a reaction of the head. But when those in denial hear a pro-life argument, they are agitated--a reaction of the heart. This different reaction necessitates a //fundamentally different// response.
 +
 +It is here where the pro-lifer must learn to master the art of **branching from the head to the heart**. "Head" questions ask //what// someone believes, but heart questions ask //why// someone believes what they believe. Because heart apologetics are such a significant (and at times complex) part of pro-life dialogue, we have [[https://wiki.brephos.net/wiki/utsfl/classroom/seminars/start|an entire section]] dedicated to heart apologetics. However, pro-life advocates should keep this over-arching principle in mind: **Seek to understand.**
 +  - Ask gentle, open-ended **questions.**
 +    - "Head" questions ask //what// someone believes, but heart questions ask //why// someone believes what they believe.
 +  - **Listen** well.
 +    - Listen with the intent to understand--not with the intent to respond.
 +
 +When we seek to understand, we can give the other person a chance to open her heart, a chance to be listened to; and if the person brings up the difficult experiences that have led her to support abortion, we can address those experiences and help the person to accept the truth.  
  
 <note> <note>
Line 88: Line 115:
 </note> </note>
  
 +==== Inspiring the Apathetic ====
  
 +FIXME a story? Inspiring people to take action?
 +
 +https://www.torontoagainstabortion.org/2018/05/21/adoption-suffering-and-love-reflections-of-a-powerful-conversation-on-a-rainy-day/
 +- shifting someone's perspective
 +
 +https://mariamccann.ca/2023/02/10/the-truth-is-a-light-in-the-darkness/ sharing "D=S-M" in conversation to inspire the hopeless
 ===== Role-Playing ===== ===== Role-Playing =====
 Role-play is a critical part of dialogue. Role-play is a critical part of dialogue.
  
-FIXME instructions for role-playing on 100-level circumstances type issues, good exercises +FIXME instructions for role-playing on 100-level circumstances type issues, good exercises. --> Oriyana will provide some prompts to groups e.g. respond to "It's just a fetus!" etc. 
-FIXME more detailed notes, like TRTL "abortion: why not?" presentation +* etc.
- +
-Western Lifeline's notes for 2-3h workshop, work in progress-- link allows people to comment suggestions +
-    *  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ISocBjM2zjWYxHwISjmRG45tOOgpMexHmEuGR2KdSeM/edit?usp=sharing +
- +
- +
-  * Respond appropriately: e.g. CCBR blog post about going to pro-life town with SLED versus listening to someone in pain +
-  * etc.+
   * http://www.unmaskingchoice.ca/training/classroom/dialogue   * http://www.unmaskingchoice.ca/training/classroom/dialogue
   * http://www.prolifetraining.com/FiveMinute11.asp   * http://www.prolifetraining.com/FiveMinute11.asp
   * http://www.unmaskingchoice.ca/blog/2013/10/01/what-dialogue-abortion-actually-sounds   * http://www.unmaskingchoice.ca/blog/2013/10/01/what-dialogue-abortion-actually-sounds