Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
utsfl:classroom:seminars:pba100y [2017/08/01 15:05] – mmccannutsfl:classroom:seminars:pba100y [2021/04/27 12:41] (current) – [PBA100Y: The Human Rights Case Against Abortion] mmccann
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== PBA100Y: The Human Rights Case Against Abortion ====== ====== PBA100Y: The Human Rights Case Against Abortion ======
 +FIXME HR / my body/choice preamble, but then circumstances > HR > science > personhood > autonomy traditional ordering?
  
-FIXME Work on the formatting+FIXME Work on the order - circumstances / bodily autonomy / science / personhood. Starts and ends with HRA + AVP, always circling back to those.
  
 ===== Starting the Conversation on Abortion: Do You Believe in Human Rights? ===== ===== Starting the Conversation on Abortion: Do You Believe in Human Rights? =====
Line 13: Line 14:
  
 <note> <note>
-"I talked to a young woman downtown who told me she had never thought about the issue of abortion before. I explained to her the human rights argument, and the logic of the prolife position, and she agreed that abortion was always wrong." -- Emily Roberts, CCBR Intern  + 
-{{ :utsfl:classroom:seminars:emily_roberts_hrargument.jpg?300 |}}+FIXME HR argument testimony video (Maria)
  
 </note> </note>
Line 88: Line 89:
  
 </note> </note>
 +
 +FIXME testimony videos for CG/A/Q: Emily (choice) and Craig (circumstances)
  
 **What about rape?**   **What about rape?**  
Line 100: Line 103:
 </note> </note>
  
 +FIXME testimony video re: sexual assault (Kim)
  
 By using common ground, analogies, and questions, you can "bridge the gap" to the question we want to highlight: are pre-born children human beings? By using common ground, analogies, and questions, you can "bridge the gap" to the question we want to highlight: are pre-born children human beings?
 The pro-life position is very simple: Human beings have human rights. Human rights should begin when a human being's life begins. And science tells us when a new human beings begins: at fertilization.   The pro-life position is very simple: Human beings have human rights. Human rights should begin when a human being's life begins. And science tells us when a new human beings begins: at fertilization.  
 +
 +
  
 ===== The Science of When Life Begins: Do Humans Reproduce Other Living Humans? ===== ===== The Science of When Life Begins: Do Humans Reproduce Other Living Humans? =====
Line 115: Line 121:
  
 ==== Dialogue about Fertilization: Before, At, or After? ==== ==== Dialogue about Fertilization: Before, At, or After? ====
 +FIXME video from Stephanie Gray: https://youtu.be/8ia5O57nZbw
 +
   * FIXME wording   * FIXME wording
 Besides referring to experts in embryology, we can also consider for ourselves the "options" for when human life begins. Does human life begin before fertilization, at fertilization, or some time after?   Besides referring to experts in embryology, we can also consider for ourselves the "options" for when human life begins. Does human life begin before fertilization, at fertilization, or some time after?  
Line 242: Line 250:
 <note> <note>
 **"They're not persons."** **"They're not persons."**
 +{{youtube>TRaW4uOK2OE?medium}}
  
-{{:utsfl:classroom:seminars:personhood.jpg|}} 
 Some lessons take the longest to learn. Shouldn't all human beings have human rights? Some lessons take the longest to learn. Shouldn't all human beings have human rights?
 </note> </note>